Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Ind. 286 - Harness v. Steele

Harness v. Steele’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
6
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 78 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Henderson (1957), 171 Ind. App. 315 - Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Smith (1976)

2 federal appellate · 78 state decisions

180190219101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jeffersonville Water Supply Co. v. Riter · Dœring v. State · Brock v. Stimson · Palmer v. Maine Central Railroad · Simmons v. Vandyke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But the power of detaining the person so arrested, or restraining him of his liberty, in such a case is not a matter within the discretion of the officer making the arrest. He cannot legally ’hold the person arrested in custody for a longer period of time than is reasonably necessary, under all of the circumstances of the case, to obtain a proper warrant or order for his further detention from some tribunal or officer authorized under the law to issue such a warrant or order. If the person arrested is detained or held by the officer for a longer period of time than is required under the circumstances, without. such warrant or authority, he will have a cause of action for false imprisonment against the officer and all others by whom he has been unlawfully detained or held.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.