159 Ind. App. 136 - Storm v. Marsischke’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably 170 Ind. App. 295 - Burger Man, Inc. v. Jordan Paper Products, Inc. (1976), 181 Ind. App. 197 - Stuteville v. Downing (1979)
9 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 143 Ind. App. 370 - Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Local Readers Service, Inc. · 136 Ind. App. 12 - Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Coffin · 158 Ind. App. 478 - Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. Voss · 105 Ind. App. 405 - Feucht v. Real Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc. · Holland v. Farrier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Sluch a manifestation by the principal may be found ... where the principal clothes or allows a special agent to act with the appearance of possessing more authority than is actually conferred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"[T]hat there are cases where, to prevent fraud or injustice, it is necessary to disregard the fiction of distinct corporate existence, and to hold as a matter of equity that such separate legal entity does not exist. Feucht v. Real Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc. (1938), 105 Ind. App. 405 , 12 N.E.2d 1019 ." Hart, Schaffner and Marx v. Campbell (1942), 110 Ind. App. 312, 321 , 38 N.E.2d 895, 899 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The representations of the agent will not suffice, for it is the 'well established rule that agency cannot be proven by the declarations of the agent, alone.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.