159 Ind. App. 200 - Gray v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2006 · most notably Thomas v. State (1976), 182 Ind. App. 386 - Russell v. State (1979)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tate v. Short · 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · Dickens v. State · Landaw v. State · Hutchinson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section [35-47-2-1] does not apply to ... any person while carrying a handgun unloaded and in a secure wrapper from the place of purchase to his dwelling or fixed place of business, or to a place of repair or back to his dwelling or fixed place of business, or in moving from one dwelling or business to another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tormoehlen v. State“Any person while carrying a hand gun unloaded and in a secure wrapper from the place of purchase to his place of abode or fixed place of business, or to a place of repair or back to his place of business, or in moving from one place of abode or business to another . ..”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beck v. State““Where, as here, the penalty assessed is in keeping with that prescribed by the legislature, we cannot interfere. We may not rewrite the statute nor absent an abuse of discretion substitute what we deem to be a more equitable penalty.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hanic v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.