159 Ind. App. 303 - Lambert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 1980
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Froedge v. State · Conrad v. Tomlinson · Heglin v. State · Johnson v. State · 154 Ind. App. 81 - Laine v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A discussion of two cases in which bailiff misconduct in the presence of juries was held to constitute reversible error is presented in Lambert v. State (1974), 159 Ind. App. 303 , 306 N.E.2d 115 : “Appellant relies on Laine v. State(1972), [154] Ind.Ct.App. [81], [sic] 289 N.E.2d 141 , in arguing that the bailiff’s alleged conduct constitutes reversible error. However, that case is clearly distinguishable from the instant case. In Laine, the bailiff undertook an explanation of the various verdict forms which had been submitted to the jury. Likewise, in the recent case of Sparks v. State (1972), [154] Ind.Ct.App. [691], [sic] 290 N.E.2d 793 , the bailiff advised the jury as to the meaning of the term ‘disfranchisement.’ In each of these cases, the bailiff became actively engaged in matters relevant to the jury’s deliberations.” 306 N.E.2d at 118 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.