159 Ind. App. 6 - Kujaca v. Kujaca’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2008
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · 151 Ind. App. 176 - Helvey v. Wabash County REMC · Mueller v. Mueller · 142 Ind. App. 363 - Kuykendall v. County Commissioners · 112 Ind. App. 612 - Baker v. State Bank of Akron
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Robert Kujaca had notice of the May 31, 1972 final hearing on his divorce. He did not at any time request that a record be made of these proceedings nor did he choose to attend the proceeding himself. The rule he is attempting to invoke was not made to frustrate the expeditious handling of litigation but was made to effect a fair and equitable record for appeal. No record was made of the May 31, 1972 final divorce proceedings. None was requested by the parties. ...” (Our emphasis.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A ruling against a party does not show a disqualifying bias.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.