Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 La. 336 - Stockelback v. Bradley

Stockelback v. Bradley’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
October 1986
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 1986

20 state decisions

401925193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Davis v. Police Jury of Webster Parish · Reinach v. Jung · Weil v. Schwartz · New Orleans & Nashville Rail Road v. Ganalh & Co. · Abels v. Glover

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that where a party refuses, and does not merely fail or neglect, to comply with his obligation, the other party need not formally put him in default. No one is required to do a vain and useless thing.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.