159 Md. App. 337 - Edsall v. Huffaker’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2020
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Buck v. Cam's Broadloom Rugs, Inc. · 75 Md. App. 700 - Thodos v. Bland · Allstate Insurance v. Miller · 34 Md. App. 706 - Great Coastal Express, Inc. v. Schruefer · Livering v. Richardson's Restaurant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well settled that “[t]he trier of fact may believe or disbelieve, accredit or disregard, any evidence introduced ....” A reviewing court may not decide on appeal how much weight should have been given to each item of evidence. Great Coastal Express, Inc. v. Schruefer, 34 Md. App. 706, 725 , 369 A.2d 118 (1977) (citations omitted). When results cannot be characterized as “ ‘clearly unjust, we will not find an abuse of discretion whichever way the trial court may choose to exercise discretion.’ ” Holden v. Blevins, 154 Md.App. 1 , 8 n. 9, 837 A.2d 1053 (2003) (quoting Thodos v. Bland, 75 Md.App. 700, 712 , 542 A.2d 1307 (1988)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.