Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 MICH 77 - Andrews v. Osborn

Andrews v. Osborn’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
September 1939
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gray v. Barton · Toll v. Wright · Shurbun v. Hooper · Lafferty v. People's Savings Bank · Burgess v. Stribling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The allegations of the bill of complaint inequity to obtain an injunction against a judgment at law must be positive, explicit, and certain, and, if fraud is the ground upon which the aid of equity is asked in relieving against a judgment, it is not sufficient to incorporate in the bill general allegations of fraud, deceit, or misconduct, but the specific facts constituting the alleged fraud must be set forth.” Andrews v. Osborn, 159 Mich. 77 ( 123 N. W. 599 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.