Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 MINN 269 - State v. Peterson

State v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2017

8 state decisions

401924193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cooper Manuf'G Co of Mount Vernon Ohio v. Ferguson · State v. Royal Mineral Ass'n · Park v. City of Duluth · Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Market Street Railway Co. · State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of Ely

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * Several courts have reasoned that the legislative exposition of a constitutional provision, following closely upon the adoption thereof, may well be supposed to result from the views which prevailed among the framers of the provision."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The legislature is hereby authorized to provide, by law, for the taxation of motor vehicles, using the public streets and highways of this state, on a more onerous basis than other personal property; « * # »”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Neither the Constitution nor the act. contemplates a privilege tax. The right to use the public highways is not taxed. The owner’s property right in a motor vehicle is taxed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.