Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 MISC 551 - Maison Prunier v. Prunier's Restaurant & Cafe, Inc.

Maison Prunier v. Prunier's Restaurant & Cafe, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
3
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably Metropolitan Opera Ass'n, Inc. v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp. (1950), ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc. (2007)

12 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

190193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hanover Star Milling Co. v. Metcalf · United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co. · Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc. · Tiffany Company v. Tiffany Productions, Inc. · La Republique Francaise v. Saratoga Vichy Spring Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the right of a French corporation to sue here for protection against unfair competition was expressly granted in [Article 10bis of] the [Paris] convention between the United States and various other powers for the protection of industrial property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`any injury which might result to it from the deception of the public through the unauthorized use of its trade name, or a trade name which would lead the public to believe that it was in some way connected with the plaintiff.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “right to protection against the use of a trade-mark or trade name beyond the territory in which it operates”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.