Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Neb. 235 - Salyers v. State

Salyers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
November 1995
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 1995

21 state decisions

14019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Onstott v. State · Callies v. State · Acree v. North · Cooney v. Burke · Mauder v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is only where there is a total failure of proof to establish a material allegation of the information, or the testimony is of so weak or doubtful a character that a conviction based thereon cannot be sustained, that the trial court is justified in directing a verdict for the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whoever aids, abets or procures another to commit any offense may be prosecuted and punished as if he were the principal offender.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.