State v. Dodds’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
2 district · 18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mashburn v. Scrivner · State v. Lamy · State v. Legere · State v. Duran · State v. Ryan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In matters of statutory interpretation, we are the final arbiters of the legislature's intent as expressed in the words of the statute considered as a whole.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kousounadis · In Re Ct“To prevail upon his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, the defendant must prove that no rational trier of fact, viewing all of the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in the light most favorable to the State, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. When the evidence is solely circumstantial, it must exclude all rational conclusions except guilt. Under this standard, however, we still consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State and examine each evidentiary item in context, not in isolation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Flodin“We will neither consider what the legislature might have said nor add words that it did not see fit to include. Absent an ambiguity, we will not look beyond the language of the statute to discern legislative intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Ct
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.