Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 N.J. Super. 566 - Chaudry v. Chaudry

159 N.J. Super. 566 - Chaudry v. Chaudry’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
4
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2020

12 state decisions

50197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of America · Yarborough v. Yarborough · Smith v. Smith · Fantony v. Fantony · Grotsky v. Grotsky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... principles of comity require that the divorce be recognized here. [ Id. at 575 .]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... in accordance with the law of Pakistan, where it was freely negotiated and the marriage took place. [ Id. at 578 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.