Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Ohio App. 3d 154 - Wright v. Cincinnati Insurance

159 Ohio App. 3d 154 - Wright v. Cincinnati Insurance’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · Westfield Insurance v. Galatis · Nolan v. Nolan · State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations Board · Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “although we resolved the issues of coverage under the policy and of Cincinnati's entitlement to a setoff, the case had not yet been fully resolved and no judgment had been issued. Thus, Mrs. Wright had not acquired vested rights under the pre- Galatis law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Res judicata is a substantive rule of law that applies to final judgment, whereas the law-of-the-case doctrine is a rule of practice analogous to estoppel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.