159 Ohio App. 3d 224 - Cassel v. Schuster Electronics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dresher v. Burt · Temple v. Wean United, Inc. · Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co. · O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp. · 13 Ohio App. 3d 7 - Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is replaced only when another employee is hired or reassigned to perform his duties. An employee is not considered replaced 'when another employee is assigned to perform the plaintiff's duties in addition to other duties, or when the work is redistributed among other existing employees already performing related work.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.