Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Ohio App. 3d 34 - State v. Rousseau

159 Ohio App. 3d 34 - State v. Rousseau’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hairston · 148 Ohio App. 3d 293 - State v. Urbin · 142 Ohio St. 216 - State Ex Rel. Columbus Blank Book Mfg. Co. v. Ayres · State v. Urbin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he intent of the law-makers is to be sought first of all in the language employed, and if the words be free from ambiguity and doubt, and express plainly, clearly and distinctly, the sense of the law-making body, there is no occasion to resort to other means of interpretation. The question is not what did the general assembly intend to enact, but what is the meaning of that which it did enact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.