159 Ohio App. 3d 451 - State v. Harrington’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jenks · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Grayned v. City of Rockford · State v. Barnes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] vague statute is one 'which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Franklin v. Lykins“evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hignite“[w]hen a statute is alleged to be void for vagueness, all doubts are to be resolved in favor of the constitutionality of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Franklin v. Lykins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.