Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Ohio App. 3d 696 - Brown v. Firstenergy Corp.

159 Ohio App. 3d 696 - Brown v. Firstenergy Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably State ex. rel. Northern Ohio Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Barberton City School District Board of Education (2010), Buckeye Ranch, Inc. v. Northfield Insurance Co. (2005)

25 state decisions

130200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Pons v. Ohio State Medical Board · Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co. · Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. · Peterson v. Teodosio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] plaintiff must move to amend under Civ.R. 15(A) in a timely manner. Johnson v. Norman Malone & Assoc., Inc. (Dec. 20, 1989), 9th Dist. No. 14142, * * * 1989 WL 154763 [at ]. See, also, Peterson [v. Teodosio (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 161, 175 , 63 O.O.2d 262 , 297 N.E.2d 113 ], However, “[a]n attempt to amend a complaint following the filing of a motion for summary judgment raises the spectre of prejudice.” See Johnson, * * * at 10 [ 1989 WL 154763 at ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A party may amend his pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served[.] *** Otherwise a party may amend his pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party. Leave of court shall be freely given when justice so requires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[m]ere knowledge and appreciation of a risk, however, falls short of substantial certainty and does not by itself establish intent. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.