Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Or. 348 - Connel v. O'Connor

Connel v. O'Connor’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1972
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on S. Marks & Co. v. Crow · Sabin v. Columbia Fuel Co. · Bank of Colfax v. Richardson · Mendenhall v. Elwert · Jolly v. Kyle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““*= * * The governing rule is stated in Connel v. O’Connor, 159 Or. 348, 354 , 80 P.2d 542, 544 (1938): “ ‘When a debtor conveys the whole of his estate to a near relative, ostensibly in satisfaction of his debt to the latter, it is incumbent upon the grantee, when the conveyance is attacked in a suit by creditors, to establish by satisfactory proof that there was a valuable and adequate consideration for such conveyance [citing cases]. The grantee must also point out the various items constituting the alleged consideration, when the conveyance and the circumstances under which it was made bear the semblance of an attempt to cover up the property of the debtor [citing cases].’ ” 488 P2d at 406 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.