159 Or. App. 341 - York v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[T]o modify a judgment on the basis of an evidentiary error, we must have before us a record that affirmatively establishes prejudice. Without that record, we cannot reverse. In practical terms, that means that the party seeking a modification or reversal on the basis of the asserted error will have a burden to ensure that the appellate record permits the court to make the determination necessary to award the relief the party seeks.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 293 Or. App. 68 - State v. Richen

2. “In other words, the legal theory underlying the motion must be that the moving party has a right to prevail on any set of facts and that the facts, in effect, do not matter.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 222 Or. App. 17 - Staten v. Steel

3. “[p]urely legal contentions are those as to which the facts are not merely undisputed but immaterial, such as a facial challenge to the constitutionality of a statute.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 222 Or. App. 17 - Staten v. Steel