Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 SO 756 - Charles v. Sullivant

Charles v. Sullivant’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
June 1993
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1993

4 state decisions

201935194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barnhill v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. · Collier v. Frank Varino & Co. · Folwell v. Demack Motor Car Co. · Schwartz v. Crescent-City Railroad · Hayes v. Gunter Bros. Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the instant case, plaintiff could have peered around the side of the street car before crossing the roadway, and her failure to do so was negligence which must prevent her recovery, regardless of the negligence of defendant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.