Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 SO2D 269 - Coe v. Diener

Coe v. Diener’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 1982
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1982

9 state decisions

40196419701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Surety Co. v. Willys-Overland, Inc. · Trenton Street Railway Co. v. Lawlor · Headley v. Leavitt · Cook v. Richardson · Savage v. Edgar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Stipulations. No private agreement or consent between parties or their attorneys in respect to the proceedings in a cause shall be of any force before the court, unless the evidence thereof shall be in writing, ... ." (e.s.).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that, in the absence of statutory requirement, no particular form of agreement is essential to the validity of a compromise; and it need not be in writing unless so required by special statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.