Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 So. 2d 344 - Walker v. Walker

159 So. 2d 344 - Walker v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2005

16 state decisions

10019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Peters v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. · Martin v. Martin · New v. New · Shipp v. Shipp · Winford v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Where the unsupported testimony of a party having the burden of establishing a particular fact is contradicted by the testimony of the other party and the credibility of neither is attacked, in the absence of corroborating evidence or circumstances, it cannot be said that the party having the burden of proof has sustained that burden. Peters v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., La.App. 2d Cir., 1954, 72 So.2d 562 ; Winford v. Wilson, La.App. 2d Cir., 1952, 59 So.2d 498 ."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[Ajppeals from judgments of separation, divorce and annulment of marriage are specially provided for in LSA-C.C.P. Art. 3942. Any appeal timely perfected from a judgment of separation, suspends the execution of the judgment, whether it is called a suspensive or a devolutive appeal, under the express terms of LSA-C.C.P. Art. 3942.” [Emphasis added]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.