Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 So. 2d 465 - Grapes v. Mitchell

159 So. 2d 465 - Grapes v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 396 So. 2d 744 - Hiestand v. Geier (1981), 624 So. 2d 349 - Varnes v. Dawkins (1993)

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

70196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reid v. Barry · Sorrells v. McNally · 92 So. 2d 629 - Wadlington v. Edwards · Reed v. Fain · Smith v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * To constitute a valid "trust" in personalty "three circumstances must occur: Sufficient words to raise it; a definite subject-matter; and a certain and ascertained object". * * *'"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"A resulting trust is simply a status that automatically arises by operation of law out of certain circumstances * * *. In the creation of a resulting trust it is essential that the parties actually intend to create the trust relationship but fail to execute documents or establish adequate evidence of the intent. The typical illustration is where one man furnishes the money to buy a parcel of land in the name of another with both parties intending at the time that the legal title is held by the named grantee for the benefit of the unnamed beneficiary."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.