Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

159 So. 3d 1001

Wims v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2015-03-23

Decided 2015-03-23

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petitioner alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is dismissed as successive. The petitioner is warned that any future filings deemed by this court to be successive, frivolous, abusive, or malicious may result in sanctions, including but not limited to a prohibition on any further pro se appearances before this court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.

THOMAS, CLARK, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
/159/so3d/1001 · .json · Public domain