Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

159 So. 3d 288

Witherspoon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2015-03-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2018

1 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-03-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

KHOUZAM, Judge.

¶1We affirm Cameron S. Witherspoon’s judgment and sentence in this Anders1 appeal. But we remand for the trial court to correct two scrivener’s errors in the order revoking probation, which incorrectly indicates that Witherspoon admitted to the violation of probation and lists six violations of condition five even though the trial court found only one.

¶2Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

ALTENBERND and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

¶3. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

/159/so3d/288 · .json · Public domain