¶1Affirmed. See Washington v. Recueno, 548 U.S. 212 (2006) (holding claims of error under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), are subject to harmless error analysis); Galindez v. State, 955 So.2d 517 (Fla.2007) (acknowledging Recuenoand holding harmless error analysis can properly be applied to claim that sentence was illegal for failure to submit to jury those factual findings which were necessary for reclassification or enhancement of sentence).
159 So. 3d 945
Ravon v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 11, 2015
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2015-03-11
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2019
2 state decisions
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Washington v. Recuenco · 955 So. 2d 517 - Galindez v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2015-03-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →