Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 SW 455 - Cotton v. Thompson

Cotton v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
September 1972
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 1972

13 state decisions

501913192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rosetti v. Lozano · International Building & Loan Ass'n v. Biering · Stout, Goldsborough & Perry v. Ennis National Bank · 60 Tex. Civ. App. 254 - Teel v. Blair · Grant v. Whittlesey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is shown by the pleadings of both parties and by the evidence adduced on the trial that, of the various sums of money borrowed by the plaintiff from the defendant, the plaintiff still owes $50. We think that this sum should have been allowed by the trial court as an offset to the amount plaintiff was entitled to recover. ‘The law is that each payment made upon a contract affected with usury is a payment upon the principal, applied by the law, notwithstanding it was paid and received as payment of interest.’ Loan Association v. Biering, 86 Tex. 476 , 25 S. W. 622 , 26 S. W. 39 . The judgment of the court below will be reformed by allowing appellant a credit of $50 upon the amount of the judgment rendered against him, and as so reformed is affirmed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “There is no question that a right to sue for usurious interest paid may be the subject of compromise and adjustment. Stout v. Bank, 69 Tex. 392 , 8 S.W. 808 . But such compromise and adjustment, to be valid, should be entered into in good faith, and the right to recover the usury waived by the prayer for a sufficient consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.