Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 SW3D 325 - Moore v. Commonwealth

Moore v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2023

9 state decisions

50200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin, Inc. v. Circle K Corp. · United States v. Carpenter · United States v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The bank-informant described at least one of the instruments used to fund the account as a “computer genei'ated check”.... [I]t is known from this fact alone that a computer was used to make the instrument. It was highly likely that Mooi-e used a computer or similar machine in the secrecy of his home. Thus, such a description of the instrument and the cei'tainty that Moore was passing the instruments gave information that provided a nexus between the crime and the place.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in a commonsense, rather than hypertechnical, manner.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Considering all of the circumstances, including information known to the police officer and not set forth in the affidavit, it is readily apparent that the officer acted in good faith and in accordance with the [good-faith] exception.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.