State v. Parrish’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently March 1988 · most notably Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Ramsey (1976), Smith v. Smith (1981)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Austin v. Cannizzo · Condra Funeral Home v. Rollin · Mrs. Baird's Bread Company v. Hearn · Cloud v. Zellers · Parrish v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The reversal of the trial court’s judgment is not justified unless an examination of the record as a whole leads to the conviction that the error was calculated to cause and probably did cause the jury to give the answer it did to all issues which will support the judgment. Cloud v. Zellers, Tex.Sup.1958, 309 S.W.2d 806, 808 . See also Condra Funeral Home v. Rollin, Tex.Sup.1958, 314 S.W.2d 277, 280 (1) ; Mrs. Baird’s Bread Company v. Hearn, Tex.Sup.1957, 300 S.W.2d 646 ; City of Austin v. Cannizzo, 1954, 153 Tex. 324 , 267 S.W.2d 808 .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Tjhat no judgment shall be reversed on appeal and a new trial ordered in any cause on the ground that the trial court has committed an error of law in the course of the trial, unless the appellate court shall be of the opinion that the error complained of amounted to such a denial of the rights of the appellant as was reasonably calculated to cause and probably did cause the rendition of an improper judgment in the case .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.