Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Tex. 66 - Pearson v. State

Pearson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

141
cited by 141 later decisions
3
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

139 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 141 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Denton County v. Brammer (1962), State v. Jackson (1965)

139 state decisions

3601958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parker v. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. · Williams v. Steele · Fortune v. Killebrew · Hunt v. O'Brien · Milam County v. Akers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 141 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(p. 936). "An action to condemn land is a special statutory proceeding, wholly administrative in nature, at least until the commissioners' decision is filed with the county judge. The course which it takes after the filing of their award is governed by Sections 6 and 7 of Art. 3266, Vernon's Ann. Tex.Civ.Stat., * * *. (p. 937). "By the express terms of Section 6, the filing of timely objections confers jurisdiction upon the county court to hear and determine the issues in the exercise of its judicial powers. It thus is clear that the proceeding becomes a civil case if objections are filed within the prescribed period, and either party has the right to appeal from a final judgment thereafter entered by the county court. * * (p. 938). "Section 7 of Art. 3266 requires the county judge, if no objections are filed within ten days, to cause the award to be recorded in the minutes and make the same the judgment of the court. No jurisdiction is conferred upon the court to do anything more than accept and adopt the award as its judgment, and this follows by operation of law and the ministerial act of the county judge. * * *"”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the county court assumed jurisdiction and the proceeding became a civil case when the judge held a hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.