159 Tex. Crim. 310 - Doyle v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2003
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 156 Tex. Crim. 144 - Brown v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Brown v. State, 156 Tex. Crim. Rep. 144, 240 S.W.2d 310 , we held that Article 727 applied to verbal statements made by an accused under arrest and had no application to the taking of a specimen of his blood. In Henson v. State, No. 26, 609, (page 647, this volume), 266 S.W.2d 864 , we held that the making of a paraffin test on the hands of the accused while he was under arrest did not violate his constitutional rights against self-incrimination. In fact, we fail to perceive any material distinction between the case at bar and the footprint and fingerprint cases so long recognized by this court.” 263 S.W.2d 779, 780 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.