159 Tex. Crim. 368 - Huckert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1972
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 152 Tex. Crim. 612 - Phillips v. State · 91 Tex. Crim. 304 - Crane v. State · 114 Tex. Crim. 72 - Davis, Jr. v. State · Newton v. State · Vowell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unless there may be found in the remarks of the court a benefit to the State or an injury to the defendant which would not have been present had the court simply overruled the objection, we would not, under the rule stated, be authorized to reverse because such remarks were made in violation of Art. 707, V.A.C.C.P.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beshears v. State“I will overrule the objection on the basis that it was a logical conclusion from the evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beshears v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.