159 Tex. Crim. 76 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1992
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 62 Tex. Crim. 610 - James v. State · 110 Tex. Crim. 560 - Evans v. State · Gaytan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A defect in the drawing of the jury panel would be material only when the jury which tried appellant was selected therefrom. Gaytan v. State, 116 Tex.Cr.R. 215 , 32 S.W.2d 361 ; Evans v. State, 110 Tex.Cr.R. 560 , 9 S.W.2d 360 . “We have no authority to presume that the jury which tried appellant was selected from the alleged irregular jury panel.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harrington v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.