Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 U.S. 235 - Ritchie v. McMullen

Ritchie v. McMullen’s Empirical Analysis

159 U.S. 235 · 1895

Citation profile

112
cited by 112 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 15 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 112 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2018 · most notably Tinker v. Colwell (1904), Government of the Virgin Islands v. Aquino (1967)

34 federal appellate · 15 district · 23 state decisions

2201895190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · Ambler v. Choteau · Hill v. Mendenhall · McMullen v. Richie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “appear[ ] to have been rendered by a competent court, having jurisdiction of the cause and of the parties and upon due allegations and proofs, and the opportunity to defend against them, and its proceedings are according to the source of a civilized jurisprudence, and are stated in a clear and formal record, the judgment is prima facie evidence, at least, of the truth of the matter adjudged; and it should be held conclusive upon the merits tried in the foreign court, unless some special ground is shown for impeaching the judgment, as by showing that it was affected by fraud or prejudice....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “By the law of England, prevailing in Canada, a judgment rendered by an American court under like circumstances would be allowed full and conclusive effect.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““As it does not allege that the attorneys were not authorized to enter the defendant’s appearance in that action, they must he taken to have been authorized by him to do so.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.