De Jonge v. Magone’s Empirical Analysis
159 U.S. 562 · 1895
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1961 · most notably 29 Cal. 2d 34 - Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters (1946), Fink v. United States (1898)
18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hartranft v. Wiegmann · Cadwalader v. Zeh · Lawrence v. Merritt · Dejonge v. Magone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““340. Bend or bolting- leather, and leather not specially provided for in this act, ten per centum ad valorem. “341. Calfskins, tanned, or tanned and dressed, dressed upper leather, including patent, enameled and japanned leather, dressed or undressed, and finished; chamois or other skins not specially enumerated or provided for in this act, twenty per centum ad valorem; bookbinders’ calfskins, kangaroo, sheep and goat skins, including lamb and kid skins, dressed and finished, twenty per centum ad valorem; skins for morocco, tanned but unfinished, ten pier centum ad valorem; pianoforte leather and pianoforte action leather, twenty per centum ad valorem; boots and shoes, made of leather, twenty per centum ad valorem. “342. Leather cut into shoe uppers or vamps, or other forms, suitable for conversion into manufactured articles, twenty per centum ad valorem.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““While, directly speaking, the products in question might be termed manufactures of the particular variety of paper stock employed as their basis, yet the resultant product of such manufacture was a higher and better grade of paper.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.