Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 Vt. 198 - State v. Murray

State v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Hamelin v. Simpson Paper (Vermont) Co. (1997), State v. Papazoni (1993)

27 state decisions

1201992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bubar · United States v. Strada · Nash v. Warren Zoning Board of Adjustment · 162 W. Va. 140 - Jett v. Leverette · Trustees of Net Realty Holding Trust v. AVCO Financial Services of Barre, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Thus, a defendant may bargain with the State for certain terms and conditions prior to entering into the agreement. To read the statute as in all cases granting the court revocation or modification power for five years from sentence deferral would deny the defendant and the State the opportunity to negotiate over the term that may well be most important to them, the duration of the probation obligation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The State's interpretation conflicts with other language in the agreement as well as with the court's order. The agreement specifies that its duration is three years, and defendant's agreement to abide by its terms is limited to that period. The court ordered a deferred sentence for a period of three years.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “court may defer sentencing and place the respondent on probation upon such terms and conditions as it may require if a written agreement concerning the deferring of sentence is entered into between the state's attorney and the respondent and filed with the clerk of the court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.