¶1 (concurring) — I am convinced that the advancement to Carl G-. Lufkin was $1,500 from the community estate, and not $1,500 from each parent. However, the intention of the testator as ascertained from the will must govern. The language of the will of each testator clearly indicates the testator’s intention, which precludes invoking the rules of law which aid in the construction of wills; therefore I concur.
159 Wash. 82
292 P 257
Feeney v. Lufkin
Decided October 15, 1930
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1930-10-15
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1953
4 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1930-10-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →