In Re Hulet’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2000
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Spokane Grain & Fuel Co. v. Lyttaker · Smith v. Hess · Marston v. Humes · State ex rel. Wolfe v. Parmenter · National Ass'n of Creditors, Inc. v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No bill shall embrace more than one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.