Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 159 W. Va. 844 - Berkeley Development Corp. v. Hutzler

159 W. Va. 844 - Berkeley Development Corp. v. Hutzler’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
6
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Branch v. Occhionero (1996), 175 W. Va. 418 - Keller v. Hartman (1985)

3 federal appellate · 65 state decisions

230197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 152 W. Va. 233 - Fanti v. Welsh · Crosier v. Brown · Town of Paden City v. Felton · Town of Paden City v. Felton · 126 W. Va. 750 - Derifield v. Maynard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he open, continuous and uninterrupted use of a road over the lands of another, under bona fide claim of right, and without objection from the owner, for a period of ten years, creates in the user of such road a right by prescription to the continued use thereof.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Where one owns and conveys a portion of his land which is completely surrounded by the retained land or partially by the land of the grant- or and the land of others, without expressly providing a means of ingress and egress, and where there is no other reasonable means of access to the granted land, the law implies an easement in favor of the grantee over the retained portion of the original land of the grantor.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The burden of proving an easement rests on the party claiming such right and must be established by clear and convincing proof.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.