Commonwealth v. Assorted Consumer Fireworks’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 246 Pa. Super. 42 - Commonwealth v. Fassnacht · Commonwealth v. $6,425.00 Seized from Esquilin · Commonwealth v. 542 Ontario Street, Bethlehem · Commonwealth v. Funds in Merrill Lynch Account · Com. v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Pennsylvania State Police, any sheriff or police officer shall take, remove or cause to be removed at the expense of the owner all stocks of consumer fireworks or display fireworks or combustibles offered or exposed for sale, stored or held in violation of this act. The owner shall also be responsible for the storage and, if deemed necessary, the destruction of these fireworks.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.