Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 Abb. Pr. 124

Morris v. Crawford

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1863

New York Supreme Court · decided 1863-02-15

This was a foreclosure-action brought by Thomas J. Morris against Andrew Crawford and seventeen other defendants. Part of the defendants had been served with the summons or had appeared, leaving others unserved, who had not appeared.William R. Stafford was appointed guardian ad litem for Maria E. and A. M. Stafford, infant defendants, and put in an answer not denying the allegations of the complaint, and submitting the rights of the infants to the court.

Decided 1863-02-15

Ingraham, J.

¶1From the decisions, I conclude that the better practice, in a case where the cause is not at issue as to all the defendants, and the plaintiff does not proceed as to those who have not answered, is for the other defendants to move at chambers to dismiss the complaint as to them. The case of Ward a. Dewey (12 How. Pr., 193) holds it to be irregular in such a case for one of the defendants to notice it for trial. There may be good reasons why the party should be put to his motion. The plaintiff would then have the opportunity of showing any excuse which he might have for not proceeding. This he Could not do at the trial.

¶2The order below should be reversed, and an order granted setting aside the dismissal of the complaint, without costs, and with leave to defendants to move at chambers for relief.

¶3Sutherland, P. J., and Clerke, J., concurred.

/16/abbpr/124 · .json · Public domain