¶1In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to property, the defendant Hut appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 5, 1961, as denied his motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
16 A.D.2d 823
Stolnick v. Hut
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 21, 1962
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1962-05-21
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1963
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1962-05-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →