Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 Ala. 774

Phereby v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1849

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1849-06-15

Tried before the Hon. Geo. Goldthwaite. The plaintiff in error was indicted for the murder of Elizabeth Sheppard, and was described in the indictment as her property.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1866

2 state decisions

Relies on Flora v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1849-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DARGAN, C. J.

¶1The case of Flora v. The State, 4 Port. 111, is precisely in point, and compels us to reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court, unless we overrule the decision in that case. A majority of the court, however, think that we should be governed by the authority of that case, and I am therefore instructed to reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court. My own opinion, however, is that the judgment should be affirmed. All that need be alleged in an indictment against a slave, is the crime with which he is charged and his. status or condition. I do not think it necessary, that the indictment should show who is the owner of the slave, even.where the owner is known, and, therefore, no proof of ownership is necessary ; but as a different rule of construction has been applied to our statute, regulating the trial of slaves for capital offences, the majority of the court are of the opinion, that we should not depart from that construction.

¶2The judgment of the Circuit Court' must therefore be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings. The. prisoner, however, will be retained in custodylo abide another trial, unless she be discharged in the meantime by due. course of law.

/16/ala/774 · .json · Public domain