Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Ala. App. 134 - Turney v. State

16 Ala. App. 134 - Turney v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1978
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1978

5 state decisions

201917192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burton v. State · Hammond v. State · Allison v. State · Downey v. State · Hill v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . Where evidence is circumstantial, it is proper to permit the state to show facts which, though standing alone, might be without probative force, yet, when connected by evidence with other facts, are material. . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.