Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 Ala. App. 187

76 So 471

Richey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1917

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1917-06-30

<p>Criminal Law <&wkey; 1090(14) — Appeal and Error-Bill of Exceptions — Necessity—Instructions.</p> <p>Where time for signing and filing bill of exceptions in criminal ease has expired, and there appears no bill of exceptions in the record, the Court of Appeals will not review charges given and refused.</p>

Relies on Paitry v. State · 15 Ala. App. 109 - Mitchell v. State

Affirmed · Decided 1917-06-30

BRICKEN, J.

¶1 The defendant was indicted for seduction. The indictment changes that Ed Richey, alias, etc., a man, did, by means of temptation, deception, arts, flattery, or promise of marriage, seduce Margarte Tidwell, an unmarried woman, against the peace and dignity of the state of Alabama. The defendant was convicted on October 16, 1916. The appeal was taken on October 18, 1916. The time for signing and filing:' of the bill of exceptions having expired, arid there appearing no bill of exceptions in the record,' this court will not review the given and refused charges. Mitchell v. State, 15 Ala. App. 109, 72 South. 507; Paitry v. State, 196 Ala. 598, 72 South. 36.

¶2 The record is without error, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed'.

/16/alaapp/187 · .json · Public domain