Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 Ala. App. 404

78 So 320

Biles v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1918

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1918-03-12

<p>Criminal Law &wkey;1090(14) — Aureal and Error — Scope of Review.</p> <p>In the absence of a bill of exceptions and the oral charge of the court, the appellate court cannot review the requested charges which were refused to defendant.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1921

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1918-03-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BBICICEN, J.

¶1 The defendant was tried and convicted for the offense of violating the prohibition law. The prosecution was based upon an affidavit, to which no objection by demurrer or otherwise was interposed. This appeal is upon the record, and without a bill of exceptions.

¶2 The trial judge certifies that no bill of exceptions has been presented to him, and the time for filing same has expired. The record contains the given and refused charges, but the oral charge of the court is not set *405 out. In the absence of a bill of exceptions and the oral charge »f the court, -this court cannot review the charges which were refused to the defendant. The record appears to be free-from error, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed.

/16/alaapp/404 · .json · Public domain