¶1
¶2
¶3 We find no error in the record.
¶4 Affirmed.
16 Ala. App. 425
78 So 419
Decided March 12, 1918
Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1918-03-12
<p>1. Indictment and Information <©=>110(55) —Following Statutory Form — Vagrancy.</p> <p>An indictment for vagrancy in the form prescribed by Code 1907, § 7161, form 112, is sufficient.-</p> <p>2. Criminal Law <&wkey;678(l) — Election Between Offenses.</p> <p>The indictment charging but one offense, the state cannot he required to elect, unless evidence of more than one offense is offered.</p> <p>3. Vagrancy <&wkey;3 — Evidence — Admissible under Charge of Vagrancy.</p> <p>Vagrancy being a state or condition continuing in its nature, the state may show one or all the facts constituting vagrancy, as defined by the statute.</p> <p>4. Criminal Law <&wkey;1168(l) — Appeal — Harmless Error — Limiting Inquiry.</p> <p>Defendant, prosecuted for vagrancy, cannot complain of the court’s action, of its own motion, not injuring him, limiting the scope of the inquiry.</p>
Relies on Newsum v. State · Kimbell v. State · 15 Ala. App. 118 - Brooms v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1918-03-12
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 1970
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1
¶2
¶3 We find no error in the record.
¶4 Affirmed.