Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Ala. App. 606 - Cook v. Echols

16 Ala. App. 606 - Cook v. Echols’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 1995

16 state decisions

50191819201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murphree v. Hanson · Montgomery v. Hughes · Prince v. Prince · Tyson v. Decatur Land Co. · Harrist v. Harrist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While it is shown that the father of the child voluntarily placed the infant in the custody of the respondents, it is also shown that -because of the affliction of his wife, and his situation .after she was committed to the asylum, there was little else he could do, and that in so doing he acted for the best interest of the child.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.