Brown v. Greer’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently July 2008 · most notably Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima County (1966), Logerquist v. McVey (2000)
43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Basey v. Gallagher · Costello v. Gleeson · Henry v. Mayer · Egan v. Estrada · Dooley v. Burlington Gold Mining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate, but provision may be' made . . . for waiving of a jury in civil cases where the consent of the parties interested is given thereto.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"In all cases, both at law and in equity, either party shall have the right to submit all issues of fact to a jury."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The court refused the demand of defendant and appellant for a jury, on the ground that the application, under the statutes and rules of court of Navajo county superior court, was made too late.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Donahue v. Babbitt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.